Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Attendees

Discussion items

Dariel gives presentation.

Thomas' notes:

  • Segregation strength plot: would look better with x-axis log; should have segregation strength 0 at AR=1
  • Clarify labels 1=spheres 2=elongated
  • averaging region is very deep; data. like kinetic stress should not be averaged over inhomogeneous regions
  • density fraction: some asymmetry in x
  • Observation: spheres always have higher kinetic stress ratio (s_k^1/s_k) than 0.5, even higher than (rho^1/rho), ratio is increasing with more extreme AR. But: you are averaging over inhomogeneous region in z
  • d_z=1 characteristic axis perpendicular to surface, d_z increases with AZ more extreme
  • Ant notes upcoming paper comparing volume vs shape segregation, and paper with Mueller Christoph
  • A_eff: uses average angle, thus not accurate; better integrate over psd.

 

Goal of the paper:

  • First show that s_k^1/s_k>phi^1/phi independent of AR
  • Then show R_eff=f(AR), and R_eff=R_sphere=1 are the transition points

Next steps:

  • Plot R_eff=f(AR) for all AR
  • Compare with the Hill Tan theory (see Deepak's paper) by looking at s_k^1/s_k and s_c^1/s_c vs phi^1/phi (using non-averaged values). Use local values, not averages over big regions
  • problem: s_c cannot be computed b/c of nan's. THis is likely b/c SuperQuadricParticle::getInteractionWith does return an interaction if the radii overlap, not if the particles are in contace
  • No labels